He sought repeatedly to deepen socialist politics by dispensing with simplistic formulations of Marxian theory. His political engagement coincided the wave of political repression against socialists and communists known as the Red Scare. Undeterred by the witch-hunts, Braverman continued his political work but disguised his activities by writing under the pseudonym "Harry Frankel". Frank" within the broader SWP. Braverman participated to some extent in the sectarian politics prevalent among the various Trotskyist tendencies. However, after being expelled from the SWP in , Braverman helped to found The Socialist Union —an explicit attempt to transcend sectarian politics and develop a broad left program focused on the U.
|Published (Last):||5 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||5.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Harry Braverman was influential in bringing sociology into the U. This lesson summarizes his major work and discusses its impact. Trotskyism and Braverman Harry Braverman , born in New York City, spent his entire adult life working for the increase of socialism.
He believed in a Marxist system for society in that workers should not yield power, and there should be no distinction between classes. However, Braverman did differ from the general Marxist foundation in that he believed socialism should and could work globally. This school of thought led him to Trotskyism, an offshoot of Marxism that had a global view of socialistic economics. Where Marxism in the form of Stalinism focuses on national socialism, Trotskyism believes that socialism must be a global policy to work.
It is the focus on and desire for global socialism especially as it relates to economics that marks the difference between pure Marxism and Trotskyism. Otherwise, they are similar to each other. Braverman felt that Trotskyism allowed him to utilize his understanding of the world in the workplace to bring about intentional socialism.
However, because Trotskyism is a branch of Marxism, Braverman is generally considered a Marxist. Through his connection with the party, he moved around the United States working in factories, and eventually edited socialist publications such as The American Socialist.
He became the editor for the Monthly Review in It has stood the test of time as an influential book on the state of work in the United States.
Braverman starts his work with an identification of facts of the human workplace. He distinguishes between labor, or capacity to work, and labor power, or actual work done. Labor is an infinite commodity, but labor power is finite. Management is represented as the upper class in the Marxist conflict between the classes.
Workplace struggles were caused by the few management controlling the many workers. Braverman relates this to capitalism, in which self-interest is key to all labor processes. He notes that capitalistic division of labor goes against nature. In his work, Braverman overtly connects sociology with economics by pointing out the impact capitalism had on family life and traditional agricultural endeavors.
Braverman goes on to discuss the growing working-class population in the country. He reaffirms that it is the labor of the working class that creates capital for the capitalists to use to control the laborers. It is a circle of imbalance, as the capitalists require more productive labor defined as that which produces capital , and laborers are pushed into deep levels of control as capitalists focus solely on productivity. Braverman desired democracy in the workplace, with shared duties, skills and knowledge for all.
Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century
Shelves: history , philosophy , social-theory , economics , work One of the things Ive been thinking about Marx lately that hadnt really occurred to me previously was how much he disliked the division of labour. You have to be careful when you say things like that, obviously. One of the things Marx says about Capitalism somewhere is that to really understand it you need to think of it as simultaneously the best and worst things that have ever happened to the world. I suspect we need to think of the division of labour in much the same way.
Braverman's Labor & Monopoly Capital: Summary & Analysis